Category Archives: Uncategorized

There’s No Place Like Home, There’s No Place Like Home…….

Okay so PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER has a soft spot for the Wizard of Oz. May be why I ended up in Kansas-on to my point.  I got to thinking the other day when I was asked why I do not belong to a professional interior design organization.  First I had to clarify that I am a dues paying member of the Interior Design Educators Council (IDEC) and I am current on my National Council for Interior Design Qualification Certificate (NCIDQ) so technically I do “belong”. However IDEC is not an organization that caters to practicing interior design professionals and NCIDQ, while an impressive credential, is not really a professional support or advocacy group. 

I then went on to justify why I am not a dues paying member of either ASID or IIDA or DSA or that I am a C.I.D.® (Certified Interior Decorator FYI).  I will not go into the why’s here as I have railed on this topic over numerous posts.  What struck me as I thought this through is that WE, the committed NCIDQ certified interior design professionals really do not have a home. We do not have a professional organization that is equally committed to support, honor, and advocate for our efforts.  With ASID’s new more open member/leadership requirements IIDA seems to be the most likely candidate for a professional organization.  Personally I doubt that IIDA is prepared, if even capable, to make the structural changes necessary to narrow its mission to support only the CIDA/NCIDQ professionals.  Furthermore public relations has never been a hallmark of IIDA’s mission. They are a professional networking organization that also advocates for the profession and supports continuing education. On the regulation front A.S.I.D. was the de facto advocacy group for regulating I.D. but they seem to have aquiesced to the evil flying monkeys…damn flying monkeys have haunted me since I first saw the Wizard of Oz 40 some years ago.

Bottom line- If we all get together and start clicking our heels loudly maybe somebody will hear us. Or maybe we’ll just wake up in the same place only to realize that we never really went anywhere.

Much Ado About Nothing

THE BATTLE FOR “INTERIOR DESIGN” IS OVER-IT’S TIME TO MOVE ON

The anti-regulation forces are getting all worked up over a spate of proposed ID legislative efforts. Mississippi, Colorado Washington, Oregon and Arizona have bills in various stages of the process. As posted in an earlier thread PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER notes a new tune from the angry decorator camp. Since the battle for the term and the practice of “interior design” particularly “non-commercial” interior design is over (grant the IJ/IDPC credit) all new legislation appears to be carefully crafted to avoid  1st amendment issues by clearly specifying “registered” or “certified” interior designers as the beneficiary of the proposed legislation. The battle for interior design is over. A new professional paradigm is emerging that allows for free choice in regard to professional validation. If you choose to earn legally recognized credentials you are free to do so. If you choose to merely practice as an interior designer with all of your God given creative talents and artistic flair you are free to do so. Is this a great country or what?  Here is a copy of the actual legislation proposed in Arizona seems pretty clear to me- IF YOU CHOOSE NOT TO “REGISTER” AND YOU WISH TO PRACTICE AS AN INTERIOR DESIGNER YOU ARE FREE TO DO SO.

House of Representatives

HB 2309

interior designer registration

Sponsors: Representative Mesnard

 

X Committee on Employment and Regulatory Affairs
  Caucus and COW
  House Engrossed

Overview

Establishes voluntary registration requirements, guidelines, and penalties for registered interior designers, and allows them to stamp and sign non-structural plans for permitting purposes.

History

Interior designers can work in a wide variety of capacities. Both large companies and smaller corporations hire interior designers as employees during regular working hours. Designers for smaller firms usually work on a contract or per-job basis, whereas self-employed designers tend to work more hours. For residential projects, a self-employed interior designers usually earns a per-hour fee plus a percentage of the total cost of furniture, lighting, artwork, and other design elements. For commercial projects, they may charge per-hour fees, or a flat fee for the whole project. Interior designers are typically required to meet deadlines, stay on budget, and meet clients’ needs. Current law requires licensed professionals review the work and sign it before submitting the design for approval by clients or construction permisioning. Nationally, the need for licensed review and signature varies by locality, relevant legislation, and scope of work.

 

Provisions

  • Adds interior designers to the heading of Title 32, Chapter 1.
  • Defines interior design documents as the set of documents and specifications that form a part of the legal contract for interior design services between an owner and interior designer.
  • Defines registered interior designer as a person who is registered pursuant to this chapter and who is qualified by the board based on education, experience and examination to provide interior design services pursuant to this chapter.
  • Adds one registered interior designer to the board of technical registration.
  • Requires a registered interior designer to have had at least five years of documented active professional experience.
  • Outlines requirements for registration as an interior designer:

Ø        Specifies that the applicant must be at least eighteen years of age.

Ø        Requests that the applicant be of good moral character and repute.

Ø        Requires the applicant to pass a written competency examination that is approved by the board and is nationally recognized.

Ø        Requires the applicant to have passed a course of study with a minimum of forty semester hours or sixty quarter hours of interior design related coursework that culminates in a certificate, degree or diploma.

Ø        Specifies that an applicant must possess at least three thousand five hundred and twenty hours of diversified practical interior design experience.

Ø        Stipulates that an applicant must not have had a registration denied or revoked pursuant to this chapter within one year preceding the application.

  • Specifies that any interior design documents filed with any state or local building department for the purpose of obtaining a building permit shall bear the seal of the engineer, architect or registered interior designer who prepared or approved the documents and the date on which the documents were sealed.
  • Allows the board to waive the examination, education, or experience requirements for an applicant who applies within eighteen months of the effective date of this bill if the applicant is actively engaged as an interior designer on the effective date of the bill, or if the board determines that the applicant has sufficient competency.
  • Prohibits the board from renewing the registration of an interior designer if the applicant has not completed at least six hours of continuing education over a two year period.
  • Specifies that if an interior designer may be exempt from the registration requirements is they are designing the interior of a detached single family dwelling or a commercial space, and the work does not involve issues of code compliance which require the affixing of a seal, and does not require that the plans be filed, renewed and approved before the issuance of a building permit in accordance with the building codes of the political subdivision that has jurisdiction over the work.
  • Specifies that an interior designer may be exempt from the registration requirements outlined in the bill if the person is not identified as a registered interior designer.
  • Establishes a class two misdemeanor if a person who is not registered as an interior designer advertises or displays any card, sign or other device that may indicate to the public that the person is a registered interior designer.
  • Makes technical and conforming changes.

Fiftieth Legislature

First Regular Session  2          January 26, 2011

SO-INTERIOR DESIGNERS ARE FREE TO RELY ON THE FREE MARKET TO VALIDATE THEIR PROFESSIONAL STATUS AND TALENT.

It seems that the logic of the anti-regulation effort has run off the rails and is now just steaming ahead on sheer envy or some sort of rabid quasi-libertarian tea party frenzy. Please take your interior design title and go practice what you preach. It will save both of our professions a lot of time and effort.

P.S. From the proposed bill in Washington State this clarification is front and center;

“The provisions of this section may not affect the use of the words “interior design” or “interior designer” where a person does not practice or offer to practice registered interior design.”

( http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2011-12/Pdf/Bills/House%20Bills/1788.pdf )

NOT SURE HOW MUCH CLEARER WE CAN GET.

P.P.S. From the NKBA regarding legislation in Mississippi;

This bill will absolutely impact our members. Further, the bill will divide the design community into those who are recognized by the State as having some sort of special skill and expertise…and all others who are unable to become certified.  Certainly, the public will attach undue added value to state recognition and place our members at a competitive disadvantage in seeking work. Why should the State help a small group of designers market their services over those of their competitors?  They should compete on the merits of their ability, portfolio and references and let the client decide.

( http://capwiz.com/nkba/issues/alert/?alertid=24470501 )

More baseless rhetoric attacking those who CHOOSE to advance their professional credentials as opposed to those who CHOOSE not to. If you are a CKD/NKBA Certified to do non-commercial kitchen or bathroom design then you have nothing to worry about despite what the NKBA tells you. Read the damn bills!

So does this mean that PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER is out of a job? Ummm NO. I still maintain that Uncle Sam should not run our public relations effort. I also believe that the angry decorators posed but a skirmish, albeit a furry bloody one, and the real opponent in our advancement toward legal recognition is better armed. Are we ready to take on the AIA?

JUST FOR GRINS

PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER needs some levity. Here, thanks to M.C. Escher, is my take on design in the digital world.

Also note the addition of a website link I hope you will all visit and enjoy;

http://bigthink.com/blogs/design-for-good 

 Cheers!

BIM Sala BIM

PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER recommends this blog for those of you pondering the influence of BIM;

http://bimandintegrateddesign.com/

If you are unaware of BIM and how it is affecting the building design and delivery paradigm including “interior design” you better get with it. From what PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER sees the engineers and constructors are driving the BIM bus and the architects are in the back seat riding out the bumps. Unfortunately interior designers are still trying to find the bus stop. 

NOTE TO ID STUDENTS: PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER hopes you can get out there and make sure we are an integral component of the BIM revolution. Well it looks like my lead holder needs a new point-  now where did I put that sharpener?

CREDENTIAL CONFUSION CONTINUES

So the pro-legislation effort in Indiana was successful in creating the Indiana Registry of Professional Interior Designers as explained in this Indianapolis Star article;

http://www.indystar.com/article/20100502/LIVING02/5020337/1084/LIVING02/Remodeler-Use-an-interior-designer

So if you opt to register does that allow you to use the following acronym;

Joe Designer, IRPID? What if you are also a professional member of our illustrious professional organizations…..then your business card could read;

Joe Designer, IRPID, ASID, IIDA

No wonder people don’t get us.

ONE CREDENTIAL PEOPLE – IT IS NOT THAT DIFFICULT

Oh Snap!

http://www.snapinteriordesign.com/index.php

$50.00 for a single question….are you kidding me?

PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER certainly does not begrudge anybody that uses their entrepreneurial spirit to create a money making venture…more power to them! That is what makes this country great. And they are also free to call themselves whatever they want. Which flies in the face of those who believe that only those who pass the NCIDQ are qualified to call themselves “Interior Designer”

However, when their concept denigrates an entire profession the entire profession should be offended. Unfortunately there (currently) is not a damn thing we can do about it.

Just another nail in the coffin of the term “Interior Design”

A Different Perspective on the Hinkle Opinion

“…..a stunning victory for interior design and interior designers:….”  

http://www.asid.org/NR/rdonlyres/207892AF-66E1-4E8E-9F11-BADAF2E220EB/0/Interior_Design_Victorious_in_Florida.pdf  

Well I guess it all depends how you define Interior Design and Interior Designer.    

In the interest of fairness I want to offer the above link to Brad Powell’s (Office Insight http://www.officeinsight.com/ )  take on the recent opinion rendered by Judge Hinkle in the Locke v. Shore Florida Lawsuit. This is important because one, it is another perspective for all to consider and two, ASID feels that it is important enough to link it on their legislation page. Of course the glowing praise of ASID by Mr. Powell certainly could not have hurt….but anyway. 

I find it amazing that both sides can, and quite vociferously, claim victory in the ruling. PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER has stated in other threads that he see’s the glass half empty on this one…at best. Mr. Powell knows who butters his bread and he is trying to spin Hinkles ruling as positively as possible for the office furniture dealers and manufacturers that he caters to.  

I really do not get the accolades he is bestowing on ASID. It took them 37 years to figure out that they could not claim ownership of the title interior design. It has taken setbacks on several fronts to convince ASID that they cannot expect the government to sort out the qualified from the not. Hence, the angry interior decorators can still call themselves “interior designers”. Sure the practice legislation remains but barely. Not sure how this is a stunning victory…..unless Mr. Powell’s wit is dryer than PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER’s……nah couldn’t be…..could it?  

The only point I fully agree with Mr. Powell on is that if the profession does not get its collective mind around this issue…regardless of what side you may stand on, we are going to lose far more than the title “interior design”. As he puts it;  

“Alternatively, if the interior design field does not significantly pick up the pace, it will find that a number of very intelligent architects have lifted their heads from their drawing boards, set aside their pencils and prejudices, seen how the wind is blowing, and decided to incorporate interior design education as a specialty within the architecture curricula” 
  
Unfortunately I doubt the organizations that represent the “field” actually read that part. I know they certainly did not read the part where Mr. Powell claims that unlicensed interior designers should be allowed to space plan and install full height demountable partitions. 
  
  
 

  

 
 

 

Time for an intervention……..

http://telegraphjournal.canadaeast.com/salon/article/1027900

Maybe PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER should start a new reality show where I help people understand that their Interior Design addiction is really an addiction to interior decorating…although I know that interior decorating is merely a gateway occupation that leads to harder and more harmful habits such as frivolous wardrobe purchases and obsessive cosmetic usage. Many hardcore decorator addicts suffer from constant architectural in-digest-ion and serious bouts of affluenza.

What a shame…..

R.I.D. A.S.A.P.

Just two examples of the pro-regulation proponents acquiescing on the title of interior design.  From 2009; 

Oklahoma – SB 592, a bill amending the Interior Design Act, changed the title of licensees under the Act from “interior designer” to “registered interior designer” and was signed into law May 13.

Texas – HB 1484, a bill amending the Interior Design Act, changed the title of licensees under the Act from “interior designer” to “registered interior designer” and was signed into law May 12. 

So what part of this needs to be legislated? All we have to do is create one umbrella credentialing agency, copyright the trademark and start promoting the brand. HELLO! Why are we paying Uncle Sam to tell us what we can call ourselves. I don’t get it…..and I am a freakin’ liberal. 

If we as a profession can do this as step one. Get everybody on the same page. Sort out the registered/qualified from the posers BEFORE we demand government protection then how much easier do you think the process to license the practice of Interior Design will be? 

AAAAAAAAArrrrrrrrrrrggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ANGRY INTERIOR DECORATORS – 1

PROFESSIONAL INTERIOR DESIGNERS- O

http://idpcinfo.wordpress.com/2010/04/17/patti-morrow-idpc-florida-interior-designer-names-to-be-expunged/

So we have raised the white flag on the semantic issue of ‘Interior Design”

We do not own it, we cannot claim it as our own. Apparently anybody can…even though all legitimate resources lead us to believe that it has a body of knowledge that can only be acquired through education, apprenticeship and testing.

At what point will we realize that this is not an issue of interior decorators vs. interior designers?  But it is a campaign/battle/struggle (insert your own war or sport metaphor here ________) between Certified Interior Designers and those who are merely interior designers?

We could be well on our way to distinguishing ourselves via credentialing and a strong unified public relations campaign. Unfortunately we got lost for the past 37 years trying to figure out who we really are.

AAAAAAAAArrrrrrrrggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!