Tag Archives: Interior Design Health Safety & Welfare

The Other Side of Regulating Interior Designers


 

Looks like the Institute for Justice is at it again. Interior Design..or what they consider “Interior Design” is supposedly the most restrictive or over regulated occupation in the U.S.. Or another way to look at it is Interior Design is the occupation that is most difficult to become regulated or licensed.

So what’s the problem again?

http://www.bastiatinstitute.org/2012/05/09/it-takes-10-times-more-educational-hours-to-cut-hair-than-to-be-an-emt-and-other-horrifying-truths-about-occupational-licensing/

Of course in the eyes and minds of the IJ anybody should be able to call themselves an interior designer and anybody with a pulse should be able to practice “interior design”.  All the more reason for ASID/IIDA to rally around R.I.D.’s and the process to legislate “Registered Interior Designers”.

Let the unregistered interior designers be – if you love somebody set them free.

Colorado ID’ers Aim to Formalize Permitting Privileges

But I thought they already had “permitting” privileges. Not if you ask the Colorado AIA;

 http://www.aiacolorado.org/LandingManagement/LatestNews/legislative-alert-aia-colorado-opposes-sb12120.aspx

So I guess there is some confusion and the Colorado ID’ers are seeking to sort it out;

http://www.iidarmc.org/wp-content/uploads/FINALFact+Sheet+-SB+12-120.pdf

Should be another case of who’s lobbyist can beat up the other’s lobbyist.

My money is on the AIA- sorry Colorado ID’ers.

OREGON COMMERCIAL INTERIOR DESIGNERS PUSH FOR PRACTICE LICENSE

http://djcoregon.com/news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/

The Interior Design Collaborative in Oregon is pushing hard for a bill that would regulate interior designers wishing to practice commercial interior design in Oregon http://www.idc-oregon.org/legislation.html

So the angry decorators and the NKBA are still pitching a hissy fit but their dogs ain’t in the hunt.  The old “let the public decide” and there is no need to protect the health and safety of the occupants of public commercial interior environments continues to sound more like whining than legitimate constitutional concerns.  The public is welcome to pick the person who can select the appropriate pillow tassels for their Ostrich skin Barco-Lounger but to say that the designers of public commercial spaces should not have to prove their competency to practice in such highly regulated, code governed environments is simply stupid.   

UPDATE 2/1/2012- More detail on the angry decorators and libertarian kitchen designers crusade to end all regulation-

http://djcoregon.com/news/2012/01/26/interior-design-bill-sparks-professional-controversy/ 

However, PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER is concerned that the commercial interior design tack that the IDC is taking is going to set a precedent across the country as other ID coalitions prepare to regulate on their turf.  Are we now a two class profession?

I also find it interesting that Ms. Snyder Carlson felt it necessary to toss out the IA analogy…….. “But Alicia Snyder-Carlson, president of the IDC, says the interior design market has shifted more toward the realm of interior architecture, which means commercial designers are making decisions that impact occupants’ safety.”

I understand that people say things under heat that upon further reflection may not have been in their, or their organization’s, best interest.  Let’s figure out the ramifications of distinguishing residential and commercial interior design before we make the leap to interior designers and interior architects please.

Does Lenny Kravitz Care About His Body

Of Knowledge?

http://www.torontolife.com/daily/hype/creative-types/2011/11/29/lenny-kravitz-bisha-hotel-toronto/

Not only no but HELL NO! Lenny Kravitz could give a rip about the profession of interior design as we define it. He is an interior designer because he can be- period. He is doing just fine with his natural talent and flair which he has in spades.  Should he ever need a permit he can buy the services of an architect or a licensed interior designer to get it. That is how all of the star designers (from Barbara Streisand to Posh Spice) as well as other creatives like Karim Rashid and Phillipe Starck do it.  They surround themselves with licensed, certified and registered design professionals- and why not?  Which one of us would say no to Lenny Kravitz if he called and asked “hey PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER wanna hook up on my South Beach condo project?“  “Um well Mr. Kravitz I am not registered in Florida so I will have to decline your offer“……Nobody will turn their accredited degree/licensed noses up to them- nobody.  So what is my point?

Will we, the accredited and certified interior design professionals, as defined in the ID Body of Knowledge ( http://www.idbok.org/PDFs/IDBOK_2010_sum.pdf ), be recognized by the general public as somehow better qualified than Lenny Kravitz or Venus Williams ( http://vstarrinteriors.com/ ) ? How will NOT abiding by the tenets of professional interior design as defined in our body of knowledge ”marginalize” the innately qualified? If somebody like Lenny Kravitz were to proclaim that he is a ”professional” interior designer who would say otherwise? Now if he were to proclaim that he is a “registered” interior designer that would be another story but he will never have to go there as long as he can say that he is an “interior designer”.  Semantic hair-splitting?

YES.

Unfortunately in the dearth of a unified and focused public relations effort our default mode of distinguishing “professional” or ”registered” interior designers from the innately qualified is to lean on Uncle Sam to validate us.  Is this the only way forward?

Too many questions?

Right.

Yes Virginia There is No ID Clause

Or how limiting competition reduces “barriers to business”….

http://www.virginiabusiness.com/index.php/news/article/mcdonnell-reveals-government-reform-plans-to-cut-2-million/315538/

HERE WE GO AGAIN- Looks like ID is on the shortlist of professions to get de-regulated in Virginia……with the proverbial hair braiders? WTF?

Here is a blurb from the Virginia CID’ers;

http://library.constantcontact.com/download/get/file/1102037575804-371/Virginia+Certified+Interior+Designers+Proposed+Deregulation+11-17-11.pdf

What PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER does not get (at least directly) is how eliminating certified ID’ers rights to compete with architects on certain state projects is actually reducing barriers to business- seems like it is limiting competition to me- but what do I know?

Reduce Barriers to Business:De-regulate Interior Designers and Landscape Architects
The Board for Architects, Professional Engineers, Land Surveyors, Certified Interior Designers and Landscape Architects issues the Certified Interior Designer and Landscape Architects Programs. There are few, if any complaints in these two sections and very few regulatory violations.The group makes the following recommendation:The group recommends eliminating the Certified Interior Designer program and the Landscape Architect program.

 

And in California the voluntary certification of ID’ers seems to have failed…epically. They now realize that Uncle Sam is the only way to sort themselves out.

http://license2design.org/

Interesting stuff.

The Cost/Benefit of Design Edgukasion

The fact that education on all levels has problems is not news. What we, the CIDA/NCIDQ proponents need to be concerned with is whether the accredited interior design education pathway is perceived as, and results in, a good investment of student’s (vis-a-vis parents and loans) tuition monies.

Per this article some folks are saying that architectural education may exceed the return on an investment in an architecture degree.

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/power-your-future/12-most-overrated-jobs-221553598.html

Since ID education is closely allied we should all be concerned that we are providing a good return on an ID degree.  On that point I am certain that it does- but I am partial.  However there are forces that affect the perceived value of such an investment that make me wonder.

Obviously the spiraling cost of higher education is much bigger than us. This is a societal issue that I can only hope we all get our collective brains around and quickly. On a more local level we need to advocate for the value of a degree in interior design because unfortunately nobody else is. Our professional organizations are too busy trying to be everything to everybody and in so doing are tacitly diminishing the importance of an accredited degree path, monitored experience and proof of baseline competency via an examination.

PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER sees the pendulum of the societal comprehension of the value of interior design education swinging toward the “why bother” side of the paradigm. That should concern all of us but we as educators really need to figure this out. 

How can we provide a good return on our students investment if society does not value their degree?

P.S. Speaking of design education here is an interesting video from Edutopia regarding using design/architecture to help students learn;

http://www.edutopia.org/build-sf-learning-design-civic-education-video

 

Making the Grade with NCIDQ

Fall 2011 NCIDQ Grading Session Dallas, Texas

PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER is proud to have just completed his 3rd in a row NCIDQ grading session.  As an ID instructor it is important for me to keep up with the exam and the process. As an ID Blogger it is even more important that I participate and contribute to the development and advancement of the profession. I liken it to not voting and then sitting around and bitching about the president. Not voting is a free choice. Complaining about the results  however is unacceptable. So with that I donate about 4 days of my time to travel to Dallas, take a pre-test of next year’s exam, grade for 2 1/2 days and then travel back home.

The folks at NCIDQ have my admiration for the job they have done to re-engineer the exam to be more pertinent to issues of construction, health, safety,welfare and industry practice. They also do an amazing job with the logistics of the exam to make sure the process is fair, consistent and rigorous.

Many complain about the exam. I find most of those folks are basing their opinions on the old exam or even heresy.  Others simply like to complain. If you want to complain I suggest you either take the exam, help grade it or in some other way help to improve it. Otherwise bite your lip.

Another Yawner From the Anti-Regulationists

Here is another obfuscation blog blast from the CATO Institute intentionally misinforming and taking advantage of our dismal efforts to distinguish the vetted from the innately qualified;

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/should-you-need-a-license-to-hang-curtains/

It’s too bad we are such low hanging fruit for these guys.  ASID has given in- IIDA are you still with us?

Nurse Ratched Rachets Up the Battle Over Titles

PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER finds many similarities between titles and hierarchy in the medical profession and the building design profession.  In case you missed it here as a very pertinent N.Y.T. article on this very subject. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/02/health/policy/02docs.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=calling%20the%20nurse%20doctor&st=cse

So if you did not find yourself substituting “Architect” for “Doctor” and “Interior Designer” for “Nurse” then maybe I need to seek medical help….from a Nurse Doctor…

NO! A Dr. Nurse…….

NO! Howbout an Interior Architect Building Nurse Decorator Doctor Ph.D…AAAAAAAArrrrrrggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhh!

Anyway there are a lot of lessons to be learned from the Nurses march to become peers with MD.’s, or at least to earn the moniker “Doctor”.

“As demand for health care services has grown, physicians have stopped serving as the sole gatekeepers for their patients’ entry into the system. So physicians must increasingly share their patients — not only with one another but also with other professions. Teamwork is the new mantra of medicine, and nurse practitioners and physician assistants (sometimes known as midlevels or physician extenders) have become increasingly important care providers, particularly in rural areas.”

Sounds a lot like architects and certified interior designers roles in the building design effort doesn’t it?  Now if only we could find some leadership that might see that it is in both of our profession’s best interests to acknowledge that it is no longer 1975 and that we can adapt to the evolution of both of our professions or we can become irrelevant. Adapt or die as they say.

The More Things Change……….

The More They Stay the Same

PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER has been too busy to post, but not too busy to keep up with the exciting and dynamic world of the Interior Design profession’s march to legitimacy….or is it a Slip N’ Slide to legitimacy?  Recently there has been three developments that may or may not help clear the path ahead (see previous post- I have to work on the trail analogy- bear with me)

DEVELOPMENT #1: ASID Revises Membership Requirements and Board Structure

For details on this bold move see the posts on this very blog- I still don’t know why they were posted here but I guess I am flattered.

http://professionalinteriordesigner.com/2011/08/03/asids-new-membership-structure/

And a follow-up posting here.

http://professionalinteriordesigner.com/2011/08/12/follow-up-on-asid-membership-changes/

DEVELOPMENT #2: NCIDQ Proposes New Experience Only Path to Qualify to Sit for Exam

This from Jeff Kenney at NCIDQ HQ- ”For three years NCIDQ has been investigating the possibility of adding a path to eligibility for the Examination that would accommodate individuals who do not meet our current eligibility requirements but still possess the same competencies as those who meet the current requirements. We are tentatively calling this the “Broadly Experienced Interior Designer” program, or “BEID.”

1. Nothing has been decided. NCIDQ has charged a task force of volunteers to investigate this possibility. This is something we do with all potential new programs or requirements. We start with research, then build a draft program and then test that program. We are currently conducting a pilot test of this possible new eligibility path. After all steps in our investigation are complete, the NCIDQ Board of Directors will have the options to adopt the new requirements, not adopt them or send work back to the task force for further investigation. At this time, there is no change to our requirements.

2. NCIDQ’s requirements for the Certificate include meeting an educational standard, meeting an experience standard and meeting an examination standard. Once a person successfully satisfies all three standards he or she is awarded the NCIDQ Certificate. The proposed BEID program is intended to cure educational deficiencies only. In other words, we are looking for a way to qualify individuals who, through many life events, have not had the opportunity to satisfy one of our current educational requirements or cannot adequately document their education. Some examples of the individuals caught in this situation are listed in #6 below.

3. In order to “cure an educational deficiency” an applicant to NCIDQ will be required to meet a higher standard of proof of interior design competence than anyone who currently applies for eligibility to NCIDQ through our current policies. Therefore, the new requirements, if they ever come into effect, will be a higher standard than any of our current standards. (Not lower, as some have asserted.) The new standard will require every individual who applies under this requirement to demonstrate that he or she has achieved competencies in each CIDA-based standard currently in effect. For current applicants with a CIDA-accredited degree, NCIDQ does not ask to see the work of every graduate to ensure that he or she has met every one of CIDA’s standards for accreditation. It’s possible to earn a CIDA-accredited degree and be a D+ student. NCIDQ’s new requirements, if they come into effect, will require a dossier from applicants that shows how and when they achieved competency in each CIDA standard. This will be a significant commitment for each person who elects to undertake this hurdle toward achieving the NCIDQ Certificate.

4. NCIDQ makes every effort to not discriminate with all of our standards and requirements. For the Examination, we have policies in place that accommodate candidates with various disabilities that might prevent them from demonstrating their true abilities without accommodations on the test. For the experience requirement, we do not place maximum time frames on when experience can be earned so that we do not discriminate against applicants who have a hard time finding work, or who take time off from their careers for a family. (Some professions do enforce maximum time frames.) With education, we currently allow six different types of degree programs, but we currently can’t accept an applicant who fell one or two semester hours short of meeting our requirements even if he or she was awarded a degree. We also can’t accommodate those who graduated from schools that no longer exist and for whom there is no possibility of getting a transcript.

5. In doing our research, we learned that many professions have methods for accommodating deficiencies in one or more requirements. In the architecture profession, where we are commonly compared, there are two programs called the “Broadly Experienced Architect” and the “Broadly Experienced Foreign Architect” in the United States. NCIDQ’s member regulatory boards in the U.S. include a dozen joint boards that regulate both interior design and architecture. These members of NCIDQ have asked NCIDQ to investigate a possibility of bringing our requirements into alignment with those of the architecture profession. That is one reason that we began this research.

6. As noted above, some people who have spent many years working in the interior design profession got there through a variety of means. Here are some examples of individuals who have been denied eligibility to the Examination. We believe that the new program, if it comes into effect, will assist them in becoming eligible for consideration:
A. Graduated with a degree in “environmental design” in the 1970s when that was a common term to catch all design fields. The school is no longer in business and we cannot get a copy of course descriptions to determine which courses on the transcript were interior design-focused. The transcript does not refer to the courses as “interior design.”

B. Graduated with a degree in interior design from a school outside the United States or Canada, where “transcripts” as we know them in this country are not issued and no record of an individuals’ coursework is kept by the school, only the award of the degree.

C. Graduated with a bachelor’s degree in interior design from a program not accredited by CIDA and with fewer than 60 semester hours of interior design related coursework. This person could wait and work in the field at least four years (thereby meeting our current requirement for applicants with a 40-semester hour certificate, degree or diploma), but wants to apply after two years of work experience.

D. Attended a full interior design degree program as an “audit” student, because he or she was never aware that courses not taken for credit would not be counted toward eligibility for NCIDQ.

 7. If this new requirement comes into effect, it will only help applicants cure educational deficiencies. They still have to meet our experience requirements and they still have to take and pass all sections of the NCIDQ Examination before they will be awarded the NCIDQ Certificate.

8. Finally, NCIDQ’s member regulatory boards will continue to establish their own standards for licensure which may be different than those for the NCIDQ Certificate. This is an opportunity for individuals to gain their NCIDQ Certificate to demonstrate their competencies to clients, employers, and the like. It will not be a guarantee that any particular state or provincial regulatory board will grant this individual the right or privilege to practice within that jurisdiction’s standards, or that any professional association will accept that individual for membership.

And finally,

DEVELOPMENT #3: The Institute for Justice Files a Petition with The Supreme Court to Consider the Constitutionality of Florida’s Interior Design Practice Act.

That’s right just when you thought it was safe to go in the regulatory waters the IJ pulls another tired old rabbit out of its litigious hat. See this press release:

http://www.ij.org/about/4026

Here is the actual petition:

http://www.ij.org/images/pdf_folder/economic_liberty/fl_interior_design/flidcertpetitionsept.pdf

If you want to weep you should read the whole thing…..no really -read it and weep.

Anyway it’s really been a wild couple of weeks in the wacky world of Interior Design. And you thought HGTV’s Design Star was full of drama……Pfftttt!