Familiarize yourself here and take the survey if it applies;
So if you do not practice Interior Design in California you probably are unaware of their voluntary certification system. It is confusing….even if you do practice in California but why should we care?
As the most populous state in the Union California also has the largest number of Interior Designers of any state, territory, or province…..by far.
As an outlier to the practice and professional advancement via regulation that the other 49 states, 10 provinces, and 5 territories (3 Canadian/2 U.S.) generally follow, California’s defiance to follow the accepted system presents many issues for the broader Interior Design profession to consider.
The first is sheer numbers. While IIDA and ASID have robust participation in California the broader profession suffers from California’s insular approach to the code regulated practice of Interior Design. At a minimum reciprocity is not, and can never be, an option. Also the CCIDC remains steadfast in its control of the regulatory gate via its own exam- the IDEX Examination. Of course California is free to do what it wants with its pursuit of right to practice issues for its Interior Design professionals but its voluntary self-regulated system is such an anomaly to the rest of the profession’s pursuit of state regulated practice that it may as well be another sovereign nation.
The larger profession sure could benefit if California were to move from a self-regulated system to a state regulated/licensed practice system. The inertia and legal precedents would be helpful. BUT….That said there are positive aspects to the concept of voluntary self-regulation that PROFESSIONALINTERIORDESIGNER admires. Maybe we can adopt a hybrid system that will make everybody happy……California dreaming…..I digress.
The main motivation behind the inclusion of “Commerical” in the CID credential is the suspect manner in which California’s Building/Code officials review CID stamped/signed permit documents. There is no consistency and unless a CID has a long-standing relationship with building departments and has proven that they know their business the ability to obtain permits statewide is suspect at best. It is believed that by adding the word “Commercial” to the CID credential (not sure in what manner) that building officials would understand that particular designer has proven ability to practice in the code regulated realm.
I commend both IDCC and CCIDC for even considering this seemingly subtle title nuance.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out.